Amidst rising tensions, Russia’s Avangard missile system emerged post the US’s exit from the Anti-Ballistic Missile ABM treaty in 2002. Crafted to outmaneuver US missile defense systems, the Avangard employs a detachable glide vehicle capable of hypersonic speeds, reaching up to 27 times the speed of sound or 34,000 kilometers per hour. This weapon remains enveloped in secrecy, with limited details on Russia’s Burevestnik—a nuclear-capable cruise missile—and planned weapons tests involving nuclear explosions after a three-decade hiatus. Russia’s pursuit of a nuclear-powered cruise missile would mark a global first.
The Admiral Gorshkov warship recently showcased its Zircon hypersonic cruise missile in Northern Russia, hitting a target over 350 kilometers away at almost Mach 7. The Zircon is speculated to function as an aeroballistic missile. The Kinzhal Air-Launched Ballistic missile, launched by the MiG-31K, reaches speeds of Mach 10, designed for anti-ship missions and targeting US ballistic missile facilities. Meanwhile, the Poseidon, an unmanned nuclear-armed underwater vessel, offers versatile engagement capabilities against aircraft, coastal defenses, and infrastructure.
Enter the Sarmat—Russia’s colossal liquid-fueled ICBM with a staggering range of 18,000 kilometers. This missile’s design allows it to approach the US via unconventional routes, bypassing existing defense systems and carrying varied payloads, including decoys, challenging ballistic missile defenses.
As Moscow touts these futuristic arms amid escalating global tensions and failed counter-offensives, questions arise regarding the US’s stance. With conflicts in Ukraine and West Asia and limited financial approvals for supporting Ukraine or Israel, should the US reconsider its approach to backing Russian forces Share your thoughts below.
I am Atul Sharma, As a full-time blogger, my focus is on delivering news articles on this platform. Your visit to my blog is highly appreciated. Thank you!